Tag Archives: Health

New UN mercury treaty protects access to life saving vaccine preservative

The United Nations Environment Programme has been drafting a global treaty to rid the world of the threats posed by mercury. As part of these discussions, proposals were made to restrict vaccines that contain the preservative thiomersal, a mercury-based preservative that has been used in some vaccine manufacturing since the 1930s to prevent contamination of multidose vials of vaccine. After a concerted effort by development partners, the final text, which will be ratified in October this year, now ensures that thiomersal can continue to be used in vaccines.

The World Health Organisation has said that “thiomersal-containing vaccines [are] safe, essential, and irreplaceable components of immunization programs, especially in developing countries, and…removal of these products would disproportionately jeopardize the health and lives of the most disadvantaged children worldwide.”

As Seth Berkley, CEO of the GAVI Alliance, pointed out in the New York Times last week, “the decision should in theory be a no-brainer: The scientific and medical consensus is that thiomersal poses no human health risk, and that rather than saving lives, a ban would put millions of the world’s poorest children at risk of deadly diseases by disrupting vaccination programs.” The science surrounding this issue has become unnecessarily clouded in recent decades. This is in part due to the efforts of anti-vaccination groups, as is pointed out by Dr Berkley.

Using this preservative is especially important in developing countries. Single dose vaccine vials are more expensive, and are less practical when health workers want to immunise large numbers of children. They also take up more space in refrigerators, subsequently limiting ‘cold chain’ capacity further (to read more about this issue, read our blog from July).

In 2010 alone it is estimated that more than 1.4 million child deaths were prevented through the use of thiomersal-containing vaccines. Today vaccines are saving millions of lives every year, with coverage rising steadily over recent decades. This restriction would have jeopardized much of that progress. A job well done by those who saw off this threat.

EU Budget Negotiations Collapse

Today discussions between European heads of State on the European Union’s seven year budget due to come into effect in 2014 broke down at the end of two days of negotiations.

International development agencies have been battling to ensure that as the budget is tightened and reductions are made, overseas development assistance cuts are not disproportionately high in comparison to the rest of the EU multi-annual financial framework (MFF). Over the past months leading up to these negotiations, many organisations, including RESULTS UK, have sought to convince heads of State and relevant Ministers that despite the need for austerity, the budget must not be balanced on the backs of the world’s poorest.

Unfortunately, when the European Council President Herman Van Rompuy presented his updated proposal for the MFF yesterday it was clear that the amount allocated to overseas development assistance was being squeezed in an attempt to appease competing demands – none of which seemed to focus on developing countries. In the new MFF proposal Mr Van Rompuy had identified cuts of at least €81.85bn to the previous Commission proposal of €1 091.55bn –  representing a 7.5% cut overall. However the cut to development spending represents a 12.8% reduction – much higher than the overall budgetary reduction.

The last time such negotiations took place was in 2005, to agree the current seven year budget. This time around, as many EU States face heavy austerity measures at home there is strong opposition from some, including the UK to agree anything more than a budgetary freeze at the EU level. In a statement issued by David Cameron he noted that now is not “a time for tinkering” with the multi-annual financial framework, indicating that he wishes to see major cuts to the budget.

The next negotiations between heads of State on the budget will likely take place in January 2013 according to a statement issued by the European Council at the end of today’s negotiations.

Top scientists call for a TB vaccine to address growing concerns over drug resistance

Today, leading tuberculosis researchers including Helen McShane, PhD, Professor of Vaccinology, University of Oxford, Ann Ginsberg, MD, PhD, Vice President of Scientific Affairs at Aeras and Tim McHugh, PhD, Professor of Medical Microbiology, University College London, gathered in London just days ahead of the launch of the World Health Organization annual Global Tuberculosis report, to call for a greater focus on the development of a new vaccine in light of rising numbers of drug resistance .

This follows a study published in the Lancet in August 2012, which indicates that incidence rates of drug resistant strains may be even higher than previously expected. Tuberculosis is the second leading infectious killer and continues to take the lives of 1.45 million people each year (the equivalent of the populations of Birmingham and Liverpool combined). The increase in strains of tuberculosis that are resistant to both first and second line drugs for TB is of significant concern as the cost of treating drug resistance can be 10x more expensive to treat. While the continued research and development of better tools to diagnose and treat TB are still crucial, so is the development of a vaccine that provides life long protection against the most infectious forms of TB.

Continue reading

New declaration on TB and mining to be signed, Saturday 18th August 2012

Following on from months of discussions on the impact of TB and mining in Southern Africa, leaders from the South African Development Community(SADC), led by health ministers from South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland, will be signing a declaration tomorrow, Saturday 18 August 2012, in Maputo, Mozambique, designed to drive a regional response to tackling tuberculosis.

Why silk may one day help us reach the hard to reach with life-saving vaccines

Fascinating evidence published this week has indicated that one day silk, the common material used for clothing, could help us reach more people with life-saving vaccines. This is because the study indicates proteins found in silk could remove the need for vaccines to be kept at low temperatures and therefore transported through cold chains.

Credit flickr user woowoowoo

So what is the cold chain? As vaccines are biological products, they must be kept within a narrow temperature range, usually 2-8 degrees Centigrade (36-45º F). The cold chain refers to the storage and transport equipment that keeps  vaccines refrigerated from the point of manufacture to the point of use where a person is immunised.

Many health products have attributes that make their use difficult in places with weak health systems and insufficient cold chain capacity. For cold chains to function properly, they require reliable and adequate electricity supply, fridges in working order and production of ice packs to be used during transportation. This appears harder still when one appreciates the hot climates of numerous developing countries.

The study suggested that proteins found in silk could help protect some vaccines and drugs from heat damage, eliminating the need for vaccine refrigeration. As National Public Radio in the US described:

“Chemicals in vaccines and some antibiotics given by injection must stay in the right folded shape to work properly. When exposed to heat or moisture those folds can unfold, and the drugs or vaccines can no longer challenge the bacteria or viruses they were designed to battle”, says Dr. David Kaplan, a bioengineering professor at Tufts University and lead author on the study.

Silk proteins stabilize the medicines and act to “pin the structure in place,” Kaplan says.

With the addition of these silk supports, the vaccine (against measles, mumps and rubella) and two antibiotics were able to retain their potency at temperatures over 100 degrees for two weeks or more. Without silk stabilizers, heat that high saps their effectiveness in less than a day.”

Can new ways of delivering vaccines help us reach the final fifth?

This research was in fact intended to help lower costs in clinics in the US incurred by refrigeration facilities, but as a very welcome by-product, this discovery could have a global impact.

A report published earlier this year by Save the Children and ACTION, ‘Finding the Final Fifth – Inequities in Immunisation’, stressed remote rural populations are less likely to have access to basic health services. This can be due to various factors, such as needing to travel long distances to reach health centres or a lack of properly trained health workers. But even if such factors are overcome, the availability of the vaccine is crucial. Vaccines and related products need to reach all districts, all facilities, and be appropriately stored and ready for use. This depends on an adequate cold chain.

A recent report from Médecins Sans Frontières MSF (Doctors Without Borders) The Right Shot:  Extending the Reach of Affordable and Adapted Vaccines, highlighted these challenges in great depth, while pointing towards ways in which they can be overcome. This included through developing new products, adapted to country settings, that do not require effective cold chains to be in place. Such alternative technologies alternatives include micro-needles, inhalation, or oral administration.

If the global health community is able to circumnavigate the lack of cold chain capacity, we may have a better chance of reaching the final fifth of unimmunised children.

Heather Saunders: After $2.6 billion is pledged – why education is critical to the success of family planning

Heather Saunders is currently studying for an MSc in Violence, Conflict and Development at the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS). She is a member of the London RESULTS group and takes an active interest in areas surrounding child survival, global health and education. RESULTS UK would like to thank Heather for her valuable insight and contribution.

Last Thursday $2.6 billion was pledged towards family planning initiatives by rich and developing states at the London Summit on Family Planning. But what does this mean for women and girls in the world’s poorest countries?

According to the WHO, more than 200 million women and girls in developing countries who want to delay, space or avoid getting pregnant, lack access to contraceptives, information and services which, for many, will cost them their lives.

For teenage girls aged 15–19, pregnancy and childbirth are the number one killers, causing 50,000 deaths every year[1].

The summit organisers – the UK government and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation – argue that contraceptive use leads to more education and greater opportunities for girls, helping to end the cycle of poverty for them and their families. Up to a quarter of girls in Sub-Saharan Africa drop out of school due to unintended pregnancies, stifling their potential to improve their lives and their children’s lives. The link between the level of education a girl receives and her future achievements and empowerment is well-established. Putting girls in developing countries through secondary school is one of the most important factors influencing the number of babies they will have, as it increases capacity and motivation to reduce fertility rates.

The money raised – nearly half of it from developing countries – will be enough to give 120 million more women access to effective contraception. This will mean 200,000 fewer women dying in pregnancy and childbirth, over 50 million fewer abortions, and nearly three million fewer babies dying in the first year of life.

Continue reading

Rio+20: will we reach ‘the future we want’?

The Rio+20 conference last week was designed to provide a crucial update to 1992′s original Rio ‘Earth Summit’ on environmental issues, which introduced hugely important new international agreements including the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change. Activists and governments hoped that the summit would provide an opportunity to develop ‘sustainable development goals’ which would set out how the world will achieve development for all within the constraints of world resources. But what was really achieved, and did it live up to the title of the summit declaration ‘The Future We Want’?

Delegate adds her vision for the future to a display at Rio+20 conference, photo by UNSIDR

Delegate adds her vision for the future to a display at Rio+20 conference, photo by UNSIDR

Germaine Umuraza, a delegate at Rio+20 for the World Association of Girl Guides and Girl Scouts, explained to TerraViva news agency why the link between poverty-reduction and environmental sustainability is so important: “A degraded environment stands in the way of girls getting an education. I feel a heavy responsibility to be in Brazil as a voice for millions of girls who could not be here to speak for themselves about the importance of education, because when the environment suffers, girls and young women are affected.” In her home country of Rwanda, for example, soil erosion affects agriculture and the availability of forest products such as timber and firewood. A shortage of firewood means that the young women who collect it for cooking are often forced to spend more time searching for firewood and less time on schooling.

With such vital issues under discussion, expectations were high, but the overall consensus is that world leaders fell short in Rio. Gro Harlem Brundtland, former Prime Minister of Norway and chair of the Brundtland Commission which brought the concept of sustainable development to world attention said: “The Rio+20 declaration does not do enough to set humanity on a sustainable path, decades after it was agreed that this is essential for both people and the planet. I understand the frustration in Rio today. We can no longer assume that our collective actions will not trigger tipping points, as environmental thresholds are breached, risking irreversible damage to both ecosystems and human communities. These are the facts – but they have been lost in the final document.” Continue reading

UK Civil Society reflects on progress towards an AIDS and TB vaccine

This World AIDS Vaccine Day, 18th May 2012, the UK Consortium on AIDS and International Development working groups on TB-HIV and Prevention held an event which sought to address the importance of TB and HIV vaccines in assisting in getting to zero deaths from TB-HIV.  The key message which came across during the meeting was that a vaccine is possible and that we not only have the tools to develop TB and Aids vaccines but we are well on the way towards doing so, with sustained and predictable funding.

Continue reading

RESULTS UK welcomes Dr Sabrina Bakeera-Kitaka for World Immunisation Week Advocacy Tour

RESULTS UK is delighted to welcome Dr Sabrina Bakeera-Kitaka to the UK, an experienced pediatrician and child health advocate from Kampala, Uganda.

This week Sabrina will engage with decision makers in the UK to stress the importance of immunisation, how UK support to organisations like the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunisation (GAVI) is a high impact and cost effective use of UK aid, as well as highlighting the hurdles health systems face in reaching every child with often life-saving vaccines. Sabrina will deliver a presentation to MPs and Peers at a roundtable discussion on vaccines, and meet with UK government officials and civil society organisations. She will also be a panelist in the second session of the RESULTS UK National Conference on Saturday, ‘Making the Case for UK Aid Spending’.

Continue reading

Campaigners urge UK government to make increased pledge to the Global Fund

Yesterday the UK International Development Select Committee met to conduct a one off special inquiry into the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, TB and Malaria’s current funding crisis. During the inquiry oral evidence session the Secretary of State for International Development, Andrew Mitchell MP, gave strong UK support to the Global Fund, its current reform process and re-iterated the intention of the UK government to make an increase in its commitment to the Fund. The inquiry can be viewed here.

The meeting took place following strong calls from all stakeholders for the Committee to press the UK government on when they would deliver on a promised increased funding commitment and why such a commitment had not yet been delivered. Following yesterday’s meeting campaigners broadly welcomed the Minister’s assurances of a forthcoming commitment but urged haste in making the decision to pledge, noting that we cannot afford to wait whilst lives are lost.

In March last year the UK Multi-Lateral Aid Review judged the Global Fund to be ‘very good’ and yet as the Global Fund announced a funding shortage even to meet its minimal requirements for its new funding Round 11, no new pledge was announced by the UK government. After the Global Fund board announced its intention to cancel Round 11 in December 2012, campaigners welcomed the front-loading of the UK’s existing pledge of £128 Million, yet saw a strong need for UK leadership in increasing donations at this tipping point moment.

The Select Committee inquiry received written evidence from 23 key stakeholders and oral evidence from key stakeholders including the Coalition to Stop TB, represented by Aaron Oxley, ED of RESULTS UK. The Secretary of State for International Development was the final panellist to speak at yesterday’s inquiry and gave no clear indication of when a UK pledging moment might take place.