Tag Archives: Aid

A Historic Day

This will be RESULTS’ 1,000th blog post, and there is no better issue to be writing about than the news that George Osborne, the UK’s Chancellor, has just delivered his budget for 2013-14 that includes making good a promise the UK first made forty years ago.

In this budget, for the first time, Osborne has committed the UK to spending 0.7% of GNI (Gross National Income) on aid. It is difficult to overestimate how amazing this is.

First, what does that actually mean? In real terms, it means that the Department for International Development will have its overall budget increased to £10.7bn for 2013-14 and maintained in future years. This sounds like a lot of money, and it is: it is the kind of money that changes things.

What does it change? For one example, lets look at the money the UK Government invested in the GAVI Alliance (the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunisation). The £814m pledged in 2011 meant that the UK taxpayer was saving a child’s life every two minutes from 2011 right through to 2015. This isn’t something abstract – these are real children who get to live because of our support, with even more not falling ill. Even better, GAVI has a system whereby countries that benefit from this assistance take on the cost of vaccination themselves over time, so this makes it a truly catalytic investment.

The same is true for our investments in an organisation called the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria (known as The Global Fund for short). The Global Fund is so effective at fighting those three diseases that it is now saving more than three thousand lives every day. The return on investment, in terms of lives saved and suffering and misery avoided, is immense. The UK now has the mandate to increase its investment in lifesaving, efficient, and effective organisations like the Global Fund, and it should do so.

What this latest announcement isn’t – and we should be very clear about this – is unaffordable. The Government has rightly pegged our aid budget to a percentage of GNI. In fact, 0.7% of GNI is a very tiny part of the UK’s overall spending. Once you get past a few thousand, most of us have trouble putting big numbers into context. So, anything measured in billions might sound like a lot, until you realise that the numbers you’re comparing them to are measured in trillions. Increasing the aid budget in this way costs us, individually, pennies – but those pennies make a tremendous difference in the world.

David Cameron and George Osborne have pressed ahead with making this historic commitment despite loud opposition, much of it from within their own party. It is to their absolute credit that they have engaged intelligently and articulately with those aid doubters and repeatedly made the case for why aid spending is not just the moral thing to do, but the smart thing to do.

Most importantly, they’ve put their money where their mouth is. The result will be a powerful force for good in the world.

This is a day that should make every British person proud.

Prime Minister: disability, post-2015 goals and 0.7%

Prime Minister's Questions

Today's PMQs: Prime Minister Cameron flanked by International Development Secretary Justine Greening MP

Prime Minister’s Questions, the weekly opportunity for MPs to grill David Cameron in Parliament on anything and everything, is usually an occasion for highly political shouting matches and “Hear hears” on largely domestic issues. While this week was no exception, it was great to see an MP ask about international development issues at this crucial time. David Blunkett MP, former Labour Education Secretary, used the opportunity to ask the Prime Minister about his leading role in the UN’s High Level Panel on the Post-2015 successor framework to the Millennium Development Goals…

David Blunkett MP

David Blunkett MP asks his question

What progress has been made by the high-level panel on the development of priorities for the millennium development goals after 2015?

Mr Blunkett went on to highlight that people with disabilities were one group who had been left behind from much development progress. This is, of course, an issue RESULTS grassroots activists have campaigned about for many years. ‘Disability’ was not mentioned in any of the MDG goals, targets or indicators. Yet there are around 1 billion people living with a disability making up about 15% of the world’s population, and a disproportionate number of the people living in developing countries are disabled because of the close links between poverty and disability. Meanwhile, it is estimated that being a disabled child more than doubles the chance that you will never enroll in school in some countries.

…Will the Prime Minister identify one group of people who were not included in the millennium development goals and who are often excluded from society and education-those severely disabled young people who face grinding poverty, ill health and the disadvantage of those disabilities? Will the Prime Minister give priority to them in developments over the next two years?”

The Prime Minister’s response was good news. He confirmed: The right hon. Gentleman makes a very good point about helping disabled people across the world, and we should make sure that the framework we look at properly includes those people.”

And more good news – he also gave a strong defence of the Government’s pledge to reach 0.7% of Gross National Income spending on aid and development, which has come in for criticism ahead of next week’s budget statement….

The Prime Minister on aid spending

The Prime Minister on aid spending

“On the wider issue of our aid budget, I know it is contentious and I know it is difficult, but I believe we should not break a promise that we made to the poorest people in our world. To those who have their doubts I say that of course there is a strong moral case for our aid budget, but there is also a national security case. It is remarkable that the broken countries-countries affected by conflict-have not met one single millennium development goal among them. By helping to mend those countries, often through security work as well as aid work, we can help the poorest in our world.”

We’ll be keeping a beady eye on next Wednesday’s budget speech by George Osborne in the hopes that the Prime Minister’s fine words are confirmed in the latest spending plans. And we’ll also be watching closely as the Prime Minister heads to Indonesia in a few weeks time for the final meeting of the UN’s High Level Panel on Post-2015. Let’s hope they do indeed propose a new framework of development goals that truly includes people with disabilities and other vulnerable groups.

You can watch Prime Minister’s Questions here.

Recent launch of reports on aid and development

On Monday there was a flurry of reports published on aid: DfID released its Annual Report for 2011-12; AidWatch released their report for 2012, ‘Aid We Can: more investment in global development’; and the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) and Overseas Development Institute (ODI) released a report on British attitudes to aid, ‘Understanding public attitudes to aid and development’.

DfID’s Annual Report has a lot of figures and statistics on its work in 2011-12. We haven’t had a chance to have a proper read of it in the RESULTS office yet as it’s quite long but it does have a useful breakdown of DfID’s anaylsis of the Millenium Development Goals (MDGs), explaining how most are lagging behind the progress they should have made in order to be met by the 2015 deadline.
A few of the results DfID says it’s achieved over the past two years are:
  • vaccinating over 12 million children against preventable diseases
  • supporting 5.3 million children (2.5 million of them girls) to go to primary school
  • distributing 12.2 million bednets to protect people against malaria
  • enabling 11.9 million people to work their way out of poverty by providing access to financial services
  • preventing 2.7 million children and pregnant women from going hungryreaching 6 million people with emergency food assistance
  • improving hygiene conditions for 7.4 million people

    Andrew Mitchell, Secretary of State for DfID

    Department for International Development/Russell Watkins

On publication of the report, Secretary of State for International Development Andrew Mitchell, said that he believed that “these are results of which everyone in the United Kingdom can be proud.”

The AidWatch report is an annual assessment of overseas development aid spending by European governments. This year, ‘Aid We Can: more investment in global development’, highlights a worrying trend of cuts to aid expenditure in many European budgets. Whilst the UK is classified as “on track” to meet the target 0.7% of national income spending on aid and is a better position than some other European countries, including France and Germany, it still lags behind other countries (Sweden, Luxembourg, Denmark and the Netherlands) on aid spending.
The UK government has committed to legislate spending 0.7% of income on aid but has yet to set aside the parliamentary time to pass this legislation. So, it’s important that as campaigners for international development we keep making the powerful case for British aid spending.

Given that the focus of the RESULTS National Conference this year was making the case for aid in a difficult economic climate, those who came might be interested to hear that the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) and Overseas Development Institute (ODI) have just published a report on British attitudes to aid, ‘Understanding public attitudes to aid and development’.

Key to their findings was the argument that more needs to be done to communicate the value of development and spending. The report explains that “[i]nstead of a simple reassurance that ‘aid works, people would like to hear about how and why it works”. It called on us as development advocates to better communicate how aid can change people’s lives for the better.

These three reports certainly give us all some food for thought: there’s still much work to do to achieve the MDGs; we need to make a strong case for aid in a climate of concerning budget cuts to international development; and we need to ensure that we clearly communicate the results that we know well-targeted and effective aid delivers.

Labour MP to table Private Members’ Bill on 0.7%

Mark Hendrick MPLast week we reported a further delay in the Government’s plans to bring forward legislation committing 0.7% of GNI to aid, which could now be deferred until March 2015. Andrew Mitchell MP, Secretary of State for International Development, stated that the Government remain committed to the legislation and will bring forward the legislation when parliamentary time allows. On Sunday The Observer reported that Labour MP Mark Hendrick, who was drawn in the annual Private Members’ Bill lottery and therefore has an opportunity to table a bill in this parliamentary session, has written to the Secretary of State to offer to use his slot to bring forward a bill on 0.7%.

The bill will be tabled tomorrow, and forward publicity describes it as: a ‘Bill to make provision about the meeting by the United Kingdom of the target for official development assistance (ODA) to constitute 0.7 per cent of gross national income; to make provision for independent verification that ODA is spent efficiently and effectively; and for connected purposes.’ Watch this space for more news.

Aid, Aid, Aid. Is that all you people talk about?

Jonathan Glennie

One thing that we who work in the international development sector are sometimes accused of is that all we talk about is aid, aid, aid.

Aid critics (like Bill Easterly or Dambisa Moyo) try to point out that aid does bad things as well as good, or that aid flows are but a tiny fraction of global wealth or money flows to poor countries. For example, remittances sent from developed to developing countries are estimated at $372 billion in 2011, which is more than double total global aid flows. Even further, some argue that no one should be sending aid to middle income countries like India (technically a “Lower Middle Income Country“), even though there are around 800  million Indians living in extreme poverty. Some argue that aid is such a small part of most country’s Gross National Income (GNI) that it doesn’t – or shouldn’t – matter, and we should instead focus on the economy, jobs, and other macro-level issues.

It’s fair to say that no-one at RESULTS thinks that these other things – the economy, infrastructure, good governance, jobs – are unimportant, because of course they are critical. But it’s precisely because aid is such a small amount of money and it has such a disproportionately high impact on the most vulnerable that it matters. It matters immensely.

A nuanced view comes from Jonathan Glennie of the ODI in a recent article and paper, “Aid still matters once growth begins.” His findings are interesting and directly address some of the issues discussed at our National Conference this year, for example whether aid should still be given to India. By changing the frame of analysis slightly to categorise countries by their aid level rather than their income level, he gives us a new way to think about aid and its impact. Continue reading

National Conference 2012 announced: Aid in the Time of Austerity

Aid in a Time of Austerity: Making the Case for International Development

We are pleased to announce that RESULTS UK is holding its annual national conference over the weekend of 28-30th April and we invite you all to join us! Attending the conference is one of the best ways to experience RESULTS in action, meet other activists from around the country, sharpen advocacy skills, share your successes and hear from some of the world’s leaders in the fight against global poverty.

As we move through 2012, the continuing global economic slump has led to international development spending being more hotly contested than ever. Over the weekend we will be tackling this issue and how we, as professionals and campaigners can continue to make the case for international development. Join us at the conference to sharpen advocacy skills, hear from some of the world’s leaders in the fight against global poverty and network with other passionate campaigners and professionals from across the sector

Saturday 28th April

Session One: Making the Case for UK Aid Spending

This will involve a panel discussion by campaigners from a wide spectrum: from the young and passionate students to the time-honoured and knowledgeable professionals.

Speakers will make a case for the continuation of UK aid assistance from various persectives; including  moral, economic and secrity arguments.

Session Two: The Debate: Aid and the squeezed middle: should middle income countries still receive Aid?

The Great Debate!

South Korea is the only country to go from an aid recipient to aid giver. The UK has been giving development assistance to nations such as India, Brazil and China for decades, and we continue to do so despite their rapidly growing economies. This debate will consider the issue of whether or not these countries should still receive development aid from countries like the UK, whose economies are stagnating.
Speakers will consider issues such as when should the transition from aid recipient to aid giver take place and how domestic resources can be mobilised to help improve conditions in those countries.

Session Three: Results based spending: Will long term development be negatively impacted?

This will be a panel discussion. In this age of financial austerity, donors are increasingly demanding clear results and evidence of impact in their development spending. In this session we consider whether this focus on results and impact will have negative consequences for long term development indicators that cannot be delivered over the short term.

Sunday 29th April

Session: All day strategic advocacy campaign training

We are immensely grateful to all our hardworking grassroots volunteers. Therefore, this year we have arranged an amazing opportunity for our volunteers to have their say in the development of our campaigns, which they will be distributing.

Our RESULTS team will work closely with our dedicated volunteers, activists and supporters, to train them on planning and executing a campaign from start to finish. The session will cover the full campaign cycle from planning to execution.

  1. Developing aims and objective
  2. Understanding the change process
  3. Creating a campaign plan
  4. Identifying and analyzing stakeholders
  5. Delivering a campaign strategy

Monday 30th April

We will again be organising our famous lobby day. We have a  series of meetings set up with key figures in international development, including the DFID education, private finance and global fund teams, MEPs and MPs.

If you wish to attend please complete the Booking Form. For more information feel free to contact us in the office at felix@results.org.uk or call us on 0207 499 8238

We look forward to seeing you there!

RESULTS campaigners to join mass lobby of parliament

On the 9th of June, RESULTS campaigners will be joining hundreds, maybe thousands, of concerned citizens as they join together to lobby the government on key international development issues. The lobby, named Tea Time For Change, is being organised by Save the Children, Oxfam, Action Aid and others.

The aim of the day is to bring over 1,500 activists to Westminster to lobby their MPs on key international development issues. The main points are: to congratulate the government on committing to 0.7% of GDI to aid, to call for the introduction of increased corporate transparency laws and to push for introduction of the FTT – otherwise known as the Robin Hood Tax.

The event is taking place in Westminster, Central London on June the 9th.

We would like to invite all RESULTS activists to attend the lobby and we will reimburse (reasonable) travel expenses for those who wish to join us. If you would like to come please get in contact with Felix in the office. In the meantime, visit the campaign website, register you details and ask you MP to attend!

MPs hear from Claudia Winkleman to mark the Global Campaign for Education’s week of action

Claudia Winkleman and Alison McGovern MP at Westminster

Claudia Winkleman and Alison McGovern MP at Westminster, copyright Mark Chilvers, ActionAid

On Monday the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Global Education for All held a reception on the topic of girls’ education and the ‘Send My Sister to School’ campaign at the Houses of Parliament.  It was a hugely successful event that saw members of NGOs and international organisations, MPs and policymakers all present on the day. Speakers included television presenter Claudia Winkleman, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State Stephen O’Brien MP, Deputy Executive Director of Camfed Lucy Lake, and the Global Campaign for Education’s Young Ambassadors Navdeep Bual and Yasir Yeahia. The session was chaired by Alison McGovern MP, Vice-Chair of the APPG. The event saw the launch of a new report on girls’ education from the Global Campaign for Education UK (GCE UK).

Stephen O'Brien MP, Alison McGovern MP, and Claudia Winkleman

Stephen O'Brien MP, Alison McGovern MP, and Claudia Winkleman, copyright Mark Chilvers, ActionAid

The panel of expert speakers were incredibly inspiring and brought a powerful combination of policy related knowledge about the issue and emotional experiences of working with girls in the developing world. The speakers explained that a greater international effort is needed to ensure that all girls are able to access basic education. At the moment, 36 million of the 67 million primary-school aged children who are not in education are girls, and girls are more likely than boys to drop out of school before completing their education and to achieve less well in tests. No country in Sub-Saharan Africa sends more than half of its girls to secondary school.

Continue reading

A History of UK Aid

A quick one for your lunch break today: The Guardian have a fascinating interactive graphic that shows the history of UK Aid spending – the total amount, and where in the world it was spent.

Follow this link and click the play button to watch the show!

What do the government aid reviews mean for TB?

Following on from our post earlier in the week looking at what the multilateral and bilateral aid reviews mean for access to education, we have also investigated what the reviews mean for the UK’s contribution to global tuberculosis (TB) control.

Unfortunately, TB does not figure at all prominently in the aid reviews, but this is not surprising due to the disease not being identified as a priority within the Department for International Development (DFID) business plan for 2011 – 2015. In the summary document which covers the results of the two reviews, DFID commit to:

Support global efforts to halve tuberculosis deaths by 2015. We will fund research and development into more effective treatment and vaccines to combat tuberculosis. Continue reading