Category Archives: Department for International Development

Recording of May conference call now available

We are pleased to announce that a recording of the April conference call is now available for download.  On this month’s call we discussed the issue of childhood undernutrition and our upcoming campaigning on the issue. Over the next few weeks we are organising an advocacy tour and bringing a delegation of grassroots volunteers to London to campaign on the issue ahead of the G8 and the upcoming Nutrition for Growth being organised by the UK government.

Our guest on the call was Kat Pittore, RESULTS’s own nutrition advocacy officer. The call was a great opportunity to hear about the issue of undernutrition and the major campaigning opportunities we have over the coming month to make a big impact and turn the tables on hunger.

Click here for the call.

The Grameen Bank under threat in Bangladesh

Many discussions about microfinance begin with the same story. It’s the story of a Bangladeshi economics lecturer who had a novel but compelling idea, and how the organisation he created, the Grameen Bank, became one of the world’s foremost socially-oriented financial institutions. As you read this a new chapter is being written in this story, where the Bangladeshi government looks at loopholes in the Grameen’s founding statutes as a way to seize control of its finances. In doing so the government is threatening the rights of the Bank’s millions of member-shareholders, and putting the futures of both the Grameen Bank and those it serves at risk.

Grameen BankSo what happened? The Grameen Bank was granted institutional status in 1983 by the enactment of a special law: the Grameen Bank Ordinance. The Ordinance enabled the creation of a legal entity that would “provide credit… to landless persons for all types of economic activities”, and outlined the relationship that the Bank would have with government and its clients.

 

Three decades have passed since then, and the Grameen Bank has made loans totalling more than $9bn to millions of poor people. These clients are mostly women, over 5.5 million of whom own shares in the Bank purchased with funds from their Grameen savings accounts. Since 1987 these borrower-shareholders have also sent representatives to occupy nine out of twelve seats on Grameen’s Board of Directors, and this representation gives the poor shareholders significant input into the strategic direction of the Bank. The system was designed to ensure that the Bank retained its original focus on alleviating poverty, as well as its commitment to addressing the needs of its clients.

Grameen’s methodology has been emulated all over the world, but at home in Bangladesh the Bank has recently been under threat following a public clash with the governing Awami League party. Almost two years have passed since the government forced the resignation of the Bank’s founder, Prof Muhammad Yunus, amidst public protests from Grameen employees and clients. And a Commission of government appointees is currently investigating the legal status of the Bank, as well as the rights of shareholders and other issues. The Commission is simply the latest development in the fraught relationship between Grameen and the Awami League government, but the tone of its preliminary findings is particularly troubling.

In an interim report published recently, the Commission raised a number of disquieting points about the legal status of the Bank and its shareholders. The document supports the government’s position that Grameen is ultimately an organ of the state under the terms of the Ordinance, citing as evidence the fact that the Ordinance does not explicitly give ownership of the Bank to its shareholders. Indeed, the Commission notes that the statute does not properly define the rights of the people it describes as ‘member-borrowers’ or ‘shareholders’ at all.

But their role hasn’t been defined for close the thirty years; yet successive governments, central bank governors, finance ministers and government-appointed Grameen Board Chairmen have been satisfied with the de facto ownership exercised by the shareholders. The Commission actually specifically notes in their report that “No clarification about the usage of these terms seems to have been sought by anyone”, presumably because all parties were satisfied with the status quo where the Bank maintained its operational independence and the shareholders dominated the board. Here, members’ status embodies the spirit in which Grameen was created.

The Grameen Bank functions best as an institution that serves the needs of its clients, but at the moment the Awami League government is trying to make it an institution that is run by the State. And that is worrying.

Past experiences in Bangladesh and elsewhere indicate that governments are not always good at operating development finance institutions. For example, previous experiments in state-run microfinance have sadly been used as a conduit for patronage, vote-buying, and associated corruption. In many cases these institutions eventually collapse under the weight of their own mismanagement, leaving a legacy of wasted resources and institutionalised corruption.

If this were to happen to the Grameen Bank it would be a travesty. After three decades of demonstrating the potential for inclusive financial services to change the lives of disadvantaged people for the better, the Bank must be allowed to retain its independence. If the de facto status of the members on the Board of Directors is not properly defined in the Ordinance, then the law should be altered to normalise the situation. Any discrepancies cannot and should not be used as an excuse for the government to deprive Grameen’s members of the rights they have exercised for more than thirty years, and everyone who cares about the work of the Grameen Bank has a responsibility to stop that from happening.

A Historic Day

This will be RESULTS’ 1,000th blog post, and there is no better issue to be writing about than the news that George Osborne, the UK’s Chancellor, has just delivered his budget for 2013-14 that includes making good a promise the UK first made forty years ago.

In this budget, for the first time, Osborne has committed the UK to spending 0.7% of GNI (Gross National Income) on aid. It is difficult to overestimate how amazing this is.

First, what does that actually mean? In real terms, it means that the Department for International Development will have its overall budget increased to £10.7bn for 2013-14 and maintained in future years. This sounds like a lot of money, and it is: it is the kind of money that changes things.

What does it change? For one example, lets look at the money the UK Government invested in the GAVI Alliance (the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunisation). The £814m pledged in 2011 meant that the UK taxpayer was saving a child’s life every two minutes from 2011 right through to 2015. This isn’t something abstract – these are real children who get to live because of our support, with even more not falling ill. Even better, GAVI has a system whereby countries that benefit from this assistance take on the cost of vaccination themselves over time, so this makes it a truly catalytic investment.

The same is true for our investments in an organisation called the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria (known as The Global Fund for short). The Global Fund is so effective at fighting those three diseases that it is now saving more than three thousand lives every day. The return on investment, in terms of lives saved and suffering and misery avoided, is immense. The UK now has the mandate to increase its investment in lifesaving, efficient, and effective organisations like the Global Fund, and it should do so.

What this latest announcement isn’t – and we should be very clear about this – is unaffordable. The Government has rightly pegged our aid budget to a percentage of GNI. In fact, 0.7% of GNI is a very tiny part of the UK’s overall spending. Once you get past a few thousand, most of us have trouble putting big numbers into context. So, anything measured in billions might sound like a lot, until you realise that the numbers you’re comparing them to are measured in trillions. Increasing the aid budget in this way costs us, individually, pennies – but those pennies make a tremendous difference in the world.

David Cameron and George Osborne have pressed ahead with making this historic commitment despite loud opposition, much of it from within their own party. It is to their absolute credit that they have engaged intelligently and articulately with those aid doubters and repeatedly made the case for why aid spending is not just the moral thing to do, but the smart thing to do.

Most importantly, they’ve put their money where their mouth is. The result will be a powerful force for good in the world.

This is a day that should make every British person proud.

No Child Forgotten: Education and Inequality Post-2015

Girl in Nigeria

Image courtesy of GCE UK / Martin Godwin

“The Millennium Development Goals have left behind millions of forgotten children. Had they tackled educational inequality 9 million more children could now be in school in Nigeria and Pakistan alone.”

The Global Campaign for Education (GCE) UK today launched a new report in Parliament at an event organised by RESULTS for the All-Party Group on Global Education For All.  The new report - No Child Forgotten: Education and Inequality post 2015states that the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) have done too little to concentrate efforts on the poorest and most marginalized children. It recommends actions to address this when the world agrees a new post-2015 development goals framework. The event took place just as a major global consultation event on post-2015 education was taking place in Dakar, Senegal.

In 2000 the world agreed the MDGs, which included a goal that all children should have the chance to go to school by 2015 and a goal to achieve global gender equality in education. However, the GCE UK report shows that there was too little incentive to focus on inequalities, and nothing said about the quality of education.

Although big progress has been made – with 50 million more children now in school – 61 million children are still denied their right to even a basic primary education. Most of these are from disadvantaged groups; girls, the poorest, children living in disadvantaged areas and children with disabilities. In addition, many millions of children who are in school are receiving such a poor quality education that they are failing to learn even the basics of reading and writing.

It is vital that we focus on the most pervasive inequalities and that no child is forgotten, including those most at risk – youngsters with severe disabilities.” – David Blunkett MP

David Blunkett MP, who chaired the report launch event in Parliament today, said, “This time round we can’t make the same mistakes. As we get close to 2015 and work on a new strategy for reaching the goal of universal primary education, it is vital that we focus on the most pervasive inequalities and that no child is forgotten.

The event saw Will Paxton from Save The Children representing GCE UK on a panel of speakers alongside Manos Antoninis from the UNESCO Education For All Global Monitoring Team, Claire Melamed from the Overseas Development Institute (ODI) and Jane Edmondson from the Department for International Development (DfID).

UNESCO have themselves just published briefings ahead of the global consultation in Senegal, including their own proposals for post-2015 goals, targets and indicators which include a strong focus on tackling inequalities. UNESCO have also published new figures on the “education for all global financing gap” – the amount of additional money needed to achieve universal basic education over and above existing government and donor aid resources. Their new brief estimates that there remains a huge $26 billion per year gap in education financing, and that this gap is getting worse as donor aid to education is stagnating.

GCE UK believes that there is a huge opportunity for the British government and the Department for International Development to lead the way and ensure that there is a greater focus on tackling inequality. DfID is a major donor to education globally, and with the UK’s commendable objective of spending 0.7% of national income on overseas aid from this year onwards combined with David Cameron’s role as a Co-Chair of the UN Post-2015 High Level Panel, the UK is in a strong position to take this forward and influence other world leaders.

The GCE report sets out a vision for the ‘post 2015 development framework’- the set of goals that will replace the Millennium Development Goals, and it suggests that assessment mechanisms should be put in place to measure inequalities both in access to education and in the quality of learning outcomes.

The report can be downloaded in full here.

Prime Minister: disability, post-2015 goals and 0.7%

Prime Minister's Questions

Today's PMQs: Prime Minister Cameron flanked by International Development Secretary Justine Greening MP

Prime Minister’s Questions, the weekly opportunity for MPs to grill David Cameron in Parliament on anything and everything, is usually an occasion for highly political shouting matches and “Hear hears” on largely domestic issues. While this week was no exception, it was great to see an MP ask about international development issues at this crucial time. David Blunkett MP, former Labour Education Secretary, used the opportunity to ask the Prime Minister about his leading role in the UN’s High Level Panel on the Post-2015 successor framework to the Millennium Development Goals…

David Blunkett MP

David Blunkett MP asks his question

What progress has been made by the high-level panel on the development of priorities for the millennium development goals after 2015?

Mr Blunkett went on to highlight that people with disabilities were one group who had been left behind from much development progress. This is, of course, an issue RESULTS grassroots activists have campaigned about for many years. ‘Disability’ was not mentioned in any of the MDG goals, targets or indicators. Yet there are around 1 billion people living with a disability making up about 15% of the world’s population, and a disproportionate number of the people living in developing countries are disabled because of the close links between poverty and disability. Meanwhile, it is estimated that being a disabled child more than doubles the chance that you will never enroll in school in some countries.

…Will the Prime Minister identify one group of people who were not included in the millennium development goals and who are often excluded from society and education-those severely disabled young people who face grinding poverty, ill health and the disadvantage of those disabilities? Will the Prime Minister give priority to them in developments over the next two years?”

The Prime Minister’s response was good news. He confirmed: The right hon. Gentleman makes a very good point about helping disabled people across the world, and we should make sure that the framework we look at properly includes those people.”

And more good news – he also gave a strong defence of the Government’s pledge to reach 0.7% of Gross National Income spending on aid and development, which has come in for criticism ahead of next week’s budget statement….

The Prime Minister on aid spending

The Prime Minister on aid spending

“On the wider issue of our aid budget, I know it is contentious and I know it is difficult, but I believe we should not break a promise that we made to the poorest people in our world. To those who have their doubts I say that of course there is a strong moral case for our aid budget, but there is also a national security case. It is remarkable that the broken countries-countries affected by conflict-have not met one single millennium development goal among them. By helping to mend those countries, often through security work as well as aid work, we can help the poorest in our world.”

We’ll be keeping a beady eye on next Wednesday’s budget speech by George Osborne in the hopes that the Prime Minister’s fine words are confirmed in the latest spending plans. And we’ll also be watching closely as the Prime Minister heads to Indonesia in a few weeks time for the final meeting of the UN’s High Level Panel on Post-2015. Let’s hope they do indeed propose a new framework of development goals that truly includes people with disabilities and other vulnerable groups.

You can watch Prime Minister’s Questions here.

New UK support for girls education announced

Girls education

Photo and copyright: Erik Törner, IM Individuell Människohjälp www.manniskohjalp.se

Last week, Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg and International Development Minister Lynne Featherstone launched new education projects in Mozambique and Ethiopia that will help 89,000 girls gain an education and improve their life chances.

I’m convinced that giving girls a good education is the single most effective thing we can do to break the cycle of poverty

- Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg

These projects were three of the first fifteen ‘Step Change’ programmes to be awarded funding under the UK Department for International Development’s new Girls Education Challenge Fund, which aims to create education opportunities for some of the world’s most marginalised girls.

As a result of the Millennium Development Goals’ focus on gender equality, significant progress has been made in expanding girls’ access to education in the poorest countries. But despite this, girls continue to be disadvantaged in many countries and regions.  Sixty-eight countries have yet to achieve gender parity in primary education. Girls account for 65% of children not in school in Western Asia, and 79% in Northern Africa. And in many countries girls are also less likely to go on to secondary school, putting them at a further disadvantage.

So the Girls Education Challenge Fund is hugely important, particularly because of its focus on supporting innovative projects led by a range of organisations aiming to reach the most marginalised girls.

Nick Clegg & Lynne Featherstone in Mozambique

Nick Clegg & Lynne Featherstone in Mozambique. Photo: Crown copyright.

According to DFID, the projects in Mozambique and Ethiopia will help 89,000 girls get a decent education by boosting literacy, training teachers and even training bus drivers to provide safe school transport. Among the other projects that are being funded are initiatives to reach girls in challenging environments like Afghanistan, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Sierra Leone and Somalia.

The UK’s focus on girls education is vital, showing much-needed leadership to the international community. We hope that this new fund and its focus on innovation may in time also provide a model for DFID as they seek to strengthen their support to other marginalised groups such as children with disabilities.

Recording of Feb action call now available for download

We are pleased to announce that a recording of our February conference call, on tackling inequality in the post Millennium Development Goals, is now available for download. Click here to access the file. February conference call

Our guest speakers on the call were Gina Bergh and Emma Sammam from the Overseas Development Institute. The speakers discussed in depth the process underway for formulating the post MDG framework, spoke about the wide ranging inequalities in progress across all the goals since 2000.

The call was a great launch for our February action, for which we are calling on all our groups to use their collective voices to call on David Cameron to ensure that tackling inequality is at the heart of any new development framework.

Click to listen again.

‘The end of the global AIDS epidemic is within our reach’ – MPs debate HIV in developing countries

Just before the Christmas break, Pauline Latham MP (Mid Derbyshire, Conservative) secured a Westminster Hall Debate on HIV in developing countries. During a busy and well-attended debate, Ms Latham pointed out that ‘the end of the global AIDS epidemic is within our reach’ and echoed the slogan used by the Stop AIDS Campaign for World AIDS Day: ‘why stop now?’

Why stop now indeed, especially when we have the tools, the science and the knowledge to turn the tide on this epidemic. Pamela Nash MP, Chair of the All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) on HIV/AIDS, reiterated this point and stated “We just need to sustain the political will”.

Undoubtedly political will is vital, but there is another important element to sustain, and dare we say scale up, in response to HIV/AIDS – Tuberculosis (TB) co-infection.

TB is the leading cause of death among people living with HIV/AIDS in developing countries, accounting for one in four deaths, with 1.1 million people acquiring TB in 2011. 79% of patients live in sub-Saharan Africa, yet TB does not get the attention or focus warranted by the suffering and death it causes. Why is this the case?

As Nick Herbert MP, the Conservative member for Arundel and the South Downs and a founding member of the APPG on Global Tuberculosis explained whilst speaking in the debate:

“It is striking that the diagnostic ability and treatment for HIV are much further ahead than they are for TB, yet TB is a more easily and cheaply treatable disease. Why is that? It is straightforwardly because HIV is a disease that affected the west, and TB was a disease that the west believed had gone. Its attention was therefore not on it. The resources and money that were invested in necessarily trying to deal with the terrible and growing problem of HIV were not directed in the same way at TB. Therefore, the diagnosis of TB is not as quick as it should be, and the treatments go on for an extended period, with old-fashioned drugs that must be taken on a continuous basis; if they are not taken in that way, the problem of drug-resistant TB arises—and that is a killer and particularly difficult to deal with.”

Mr Herbert also highlighted that of the estimated 9 million people who get ill with TB every year, 3 million go without proper diagnosis or treatment. Put simply, we fail to reach far too many people—often in the poorest, most vulnerable communities—with quality TB care.

We need to accelerate our efforts to tackle TB, and it is clear that we need to think outside the box.  One way of doing this is through TB REACH, a WHO initiative that gives small grants of up to 1 million dollars to find and treat those who don’t have any access to TB diagnosis or treatment, Mr Herbert added.

He also stated that a longer term solution to tackling TB would be the creation of a new vaccine that could tackle both normal and drug-resistant strains of the disease. This would have implications not only for developing countries, but also for us here in the UK, where rates of TB infection continue to rise.

The importance and contribution of the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria to tackling both HIV and TB was widely recognised by members, as were the wider developmental benefits accrued from continued investment in fighting the three diseases.

Responding to the points raised, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for International Development Lynne Featherstone MP acknowledged the two points raised by Mr Herbert in relation to the TB REACH programme and on vaccination, both of which she said she would consider further. The Minister also highlighted that DFID’s support for TB research includes £205 million to the Global Alliance for TB Drug Development, and £14 million to the Tropical Disease Research Programme.

Ms Featherstone concluded the session by stating: “It is heartening to see so many Members who genuinely hold HIV as a priority and will pursue the wonderful goal of zero infections”.

Thousands of children’s lives to be protected with rotavirus vaccines in the ‘Warm Heart of Africa’

Malawi, affectionately known as Africa’s ‘warm heart’, has become the latest in a growing number of African countries to introduce rotavirus vaccine. This will offer its children the best possible protection against the primary cause of diarrhoea, a leading cause of under-five mortality globally, accounting for 11% of all deaths.

The integration of rotavirus vaccine into Malawi’s national immunisation programme is being supported by the GAVI Alliance, a public-private partnership focused on saving children’s lives and protecting people’s health by increasing access to immunisation in poor countries.

If used in all GAVI-eligible countries (57 low-income countries at present), rotavirus vaccines could prevent an estimated 180,000 deaths and avert six million clinic and hospital visits each year, subsequently saving an estimated US $68 million per year in treatment costs. By 2015 GAVI and its partners plan to have supported the immunisation of more than 50 million children with rotavirus vaccine in at least 40 of the world’s poorest countries. You can read the full press release from the GAVI Alliance here.

Back on the right track

Joyce Banda, Malawi's new president

2012 has been a year of much change for Malawi. Joyce Banda became its new president, replacing Bingu wa Mutharika who died suddenly from a heart attack in April. Mutharika’s last years in power were somewhat troubled, with donor capitals growing frustrated with his increasingly authoritarian style. This came to a head when the UK temporarily suspended part of it aid to Malawi in 2011 after a diplomatic dispute.

With Banda now at the helm, there have been encouraging signs emerging out of Malawi that this impoverished part of Southern Africa is moving in the right direction again. These have been both symbolic and of real weight. Continue reading

Grassroots attend APPG Global Education for All Event at Parliament

Group photo with Paralympians

On the 24th of October, 16 of our grassroots campaigners from across the UK headed down to London to attend an APPG Global Education for All event at Parliament. The event coincided with the release of the Global Partnership for Education (GCE) UK report, Equality and Inclusion for All in Education, which indicated that not enough was being done to ensure that marginalised children get an education. For our grassroots, the event was an opportunity to meet with Paralympians speaking at the event, hear their stories and highlight the importance of inclusive education to their MPs.

Three Paralympians – Sarah Storey, Anne Wafula-Strike and Ade Adeptian – spoke at the event, sharing personal accounts of how education has made a difference in their lives and why it is so important to include disabled children in educational programmes. Many of their stories were both funny and moving, highlighting the challenges that children living with disabilities face, but also what disabled children can achieve with the right support and opportunities.

The talks were followed by a Q&A session with the Paralympians and Sunit Bagree from Sightsavers, co-author of the GCE UK report. RESULTS UK campaigners made a great contribution to the session, asking relevant and interesting questions, which helped further discussion on key issues surrounding education and disability.

Jess and Cate meet Ade Adepitan

Our grassroots then had the opportunity to meet with Sarah, Anne and Ade at a lunch reception. Many used this opportunity to ask further questions or get a photo with one or all of the Paralympians. All of the photos from the day can be viewed on the RESULTS UK Facebook page.

Following the event, our grassroots headed down to Parliament’s Central Lobby to discuss the importance of inclusive education for disabled children with their MPs and hand them a copy of the GCE UK report. This was a huge success! Five of our grassroots campaigners managed to secure face to face meetings with their MPs; 4 met with their MP’s researcher; and the rest left messages for their MPs and are waiting on replies. Bristol’s RESULTS group had a particularly successful day, meeting with MPs from two constituencies in the city. Both MPs were receptive to the issue and agreed to write to Lynne Featherstone MP, Minister for International Development, calling on her to ensure that all UK aid to education is inclusive of children with disabilities.