Recent launch of reports on aid and development

On Monday there was a flurry of reports published on aid: DfID released its Annual Report for 2011-12; AidWatch released their report for 2012, ‘Aid We Can: more investment in global development’; and the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) and Overseas Development Institute (ODI) released a report on British attitudes to aid, ‘Understanding public attitudes to aid and development’.

DfID’s Annual Report has a lot of figures and statistics on its work in 2011-12. We haven’t had a chance to have a proper read of it in the RESULTS office yet as it’s quite long but it does have a useful breakdown of DfID’s anaylsis of the Millenium Development Goals (MDGs), explaining how most are lagging behind the progress they should have made in order to be met by the 2015 deadline.
A few of the results DfID says it’s achieved over the past two years are:
  • vaccinating over 12 million children against preventable diseases
  • supporting 5.3 million children (2.5 million of them girls) to go to primary school
  • distributing 12.2 million bednets to protect people against malaria
  • enabling 11.9 million people to work their way out of poverty by providing access to financial services
  • preventing 2.7 million children and pregnant women from going hungryreaching 6 million people with emergency food assistance
  • improving hygiene conditions for 7.4 million people

    Andrew Mitchell, Secretary of State for DfID

    Department for International Development/Russell Watkins

On publication of the report, Secretary of State for International Development Andrew Mitchell, said that he believed that “these are results of which everyone in the United Kingdom can be proud.”

The AidWatch report is an annual assessment of overseas development aid spending by European governments. This year, ‘Aid We Can: more investment in global development’, highlights a worrying trend of cuts to aid expenditure in many European budgets. Whilst the UK is classified as “on track” to meet the target 0.7% of national income spending on aid and is a better position than some other European countries, including France and Germany, it still lags behind other countries (Sweden, Luxembourg, Denmark and the Netherlands) on aid spending.
The UK government has committed to legislate spending 0.7% of income on aid but has yet to set aside the parliamentary time to pass this legislation. So, it’s important that as campaigners for international development we keep making the powerful case for British aid spending.

Given that the focus of the RESULTS National Conference this year was making the case for aid in a difficult economic climate, those who came might be interested to hear that the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) and Overseas Development Institute (ODI) have just published a report on British attitudes to aid, ‘Understanding public attitudes to aid and development’.

Key to their findings was the argument that more needs to be done to communicate the value of development and spending. The report explains that “[i]nstead of a simple reassurance that ‘aid works, people would like to hear about how and why it works”. It called on us as development advocates to better communicate how aid can change people’s lives for the better.

These three reports certainly give us all some food for thought: there’s still much work to do to achieve the MDGs; we need to make a strong case for aid in a climate of concerning budget cuts to international development; and we need to ensure that we clearly communicate the results that we know well-targeted and effective aid delivers.

One Response to Recent launch of reports on aid and development

  1. Pingback: What does the UK public think about aid & development? | Matthew's Journal

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>